Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
CJ Leggett
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="presjacket" data-source="post: 51658" data-attributes="member: 912"><p>Thought I would throw in my 2 cents. BTW, I have a personal rule that I don't bend over for anything that is worth less than 25 cents, so that means my opinion isn't worth getting bent out of shape.</p><p></p><p>Leggett should give B-Back a try. He should also give A-Back a try. If he excels at one position but not the other, he should play where he excels. If he excels at both positions, he should play where it helps the team the most. </p><p></p><p>Yes, we do lose our starting B-Back for 2015, but we will also lose Days, Hill, Perkins, Zenon, & Bostic at A-Back. Not only starters, but a lot of depth at A-Back. I'm not sure I can say which position will have the most need for 2015. </p><p></p><p>I sure hope the coaches are pointing out the depth chart to stud running back recruits. The opportunity will be there for an excellent freshman running back to make his mark in 2015, whether it be at B-back or A-back.</p><p></p><p>Regarding Days, I think he stays put at A-back. He is a starter there and I doubt that he would start over Laskey at B-back.</p><p></p><p>Regarding B-backs in general, I think it is probably relates more closely to running backs in other systems than some posts in this thread would lead me to believe. I also think that the A-back and B-back positions are more similar than some posts here would lead me to believe. It is still running with the football. </p><p></p><p>Regarding size, I don't think it matters. I think it is the results that matter.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="presjacket, post: 51658, member: 912"] Thought I would throw in my 2 cents. BTW, I have a personal rule that I don't bend over for anything that is worth less than 25 cents, so that means my opinion isn't worth getting bent out of shape. Leggett should give B-Back a try. He should also give A-Back a try. If he excels at one position but not the other, he should play where he excels. If he excels at both positions, he should play where it helps the team the most. Yes, we do lose our starting B-Back for 2015, but we will also lose Days, Hill, Perkins, Zenon, & Bostic at A-Back. Not only starters, but a lot of depth at A-Back. I'm not sure I can say which position will have the most need for 2015. I sure hope the coaches are pointing out the depth chart to stud running back recruits. The opportunity will be there for an excellent freshman running back to make his mark in 2015, whether it be at B-back or A-back. Regarding Days, I think he stays put at A-back. He is a starter there and I doubt that he would start over Laskey at B-back. Regarding B-backs in general, I think it is probably relates more closely to running backs in other systems than some posts in this thread would lead me to believe. I also think that the A-back and B-back positions are more similar than some posts here would lead me to believe. It is still running with the football. Regarding size, I don't think it matters. I think it is the results that matter. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
CJ Leggett
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top