stinger78
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 4,292
My neighbor said his retractible awning wasn’t that that expensive. HOA hates it, though.A retractable roof? Have you priced one of those lately?
My neighbor said his retractible awning wasn’t that that expensive. HOA hates it, though.A retractable roof? Have you priced one of those lately?
i won't go on a full Ramsey rant, but I will say that not having debt (or at least as much debt) opens up opportunities. Would GT have moved to the Big10 in 2012 if the athletic department didn't already have almost $200 million in debt? I don't know. But, I think it would have been a lot easier to convince those in charge if the athletic department had $50 million sitting around to pay the buyout, instead of having to add on to the hundreds of millions of debt. A retractable roof stadium is not just debt, it is exponentially more debt. MBS cost $1.5 billion in 2015-2017. That would be about $2 billion in 2024 dollars. The stadium would need to go somewhere else, or close Techwood and absorb some of the East dorms. It would also eliminate the midtown skyline, which is a big current highlight of the current stadium. It would do that even when opened.So spending money (admittedly adding more debt) on a 365 income producing development, is, in your opinion, a bad idea. Just wait around for us to win a three-peat and season tix are $2,000 because of demand and all our money troubles will go away huh.
I wasn't, am not and never will be in favor of any retractable roof for a sports venue because they are closed 75% of the time for all events. Having a 365 income producing development is what I'm a fan of. Think The Battery but aimed at college students and young professionals. Pipe dream I know, but if by some Bill Gates Money way ATL covers the 75/85 as there have been proposals for, GT should look at how to improve the South and East part of campus, not just looks and function wise, but financially also.i won't go on a full Ramsey rant, but I will say that not having debt (or at least as much debt) opens up opportunities. Would GT have moved to the Big10 in 2012 if the athletic department didn't already have almost $200 million in debt? I don't know. But, I think it would have been a lot easier to convince those in charge if the athletic department had $50 million sitting around to pay the buyout, instead of having to add on to the hundreds of millions of debt. A retractable roof stadium is not just debt, it is exponentially more debt. MBS cost $1.5 billion in 2015-2017. That would be about $2 billion in 2024 dollars. The stadium would need to go somewhere else, or close Techwood and absorb some of the East dorms. It would also eliminate the midtown skyline, which is a big current highlight of the current stadium. It would do that even when opened.
I don't think a retractable roof is a good idea for GT. However, I do think GT can potentially do things that other places can't. Have researchers and students work on a laser grid over the stadium to reduce the amount of sunlight that enters. If the game is at night, have the laser grid colored and show scores or animations above the stadium. Use such a thing for concerts to half-way replicate the sphere in Las Vegas. I don't know if it is possible under the laws of physics and optics, but if GT developed such a thing and put it in BDS, it would not only be exciting for football and concerts, it would highlight the technical nature of the school and research institute.
Maybe SunSetter will sponsor it to get there name on the stadium.My neighbor said his retractible awning wasn’t that that expensive. HOA hates it, though.
We could debate the merits of a retractable roof all day. The only reason I mentioned it is that it would open the door for exponentially more events. Just as one example, if Avant South turns into something of a SXSW in Atlanta, a closed roof Dodd would be the epicenter.I wasn't, am not and never will be in favor of any retractable roof for a sports venue because they are closed 75% of the time for all events. Having a 365 income producing development is what I'm a fan of. Think The Battery but aimed at college students and young professionals. Pipe dream I know, but if by some Bill Gates Money way ATL covers the 75/85 as there have been proposals for, GT should look at how to improve the South and East part of campus, not just looks and function wise, but financially also.
Well where in college football is that usually seen? It’s not the nfl. I’ve been to Neyland Stadium, concourse has the same issues. And the bathrooms up there are WOEFUL compared to GT.There are no sightlines from the concourses. That’s one of the main problems.
It isn’t. It is seen in the more modern stadiums. And that’s the point. Nobody cared about next day delivery and now it’s kind of expected. Nobody is bothered by older stadiums until they go to a newer, modern one.Well where in college football is that usually seen? It’s not the nfl. I’ve been to Neyland Stadium, concourse has the same issues. And the bathrooms up there are WOEFUL compared to GT.
In defense of Tech.The core four
Fan’s core four expectations are:
Lots of sub-details that drive the above. 59% of fans prefer to watch the game from home.
- They expect the stadium to be safe, comfortable, and clean.
- They want the view from their seats to match their expectations.
- They desire a high-quality game.
- They expect an exciting atmosphere within the stadium.
Yeah that’s what I mean. The home side is fine. Has recently been renovated and they added premium chairback seats. The other side of Neyland? it looks like a dungeon. (See below)It isn’t. It is seen in the more modern stadiums. And that’s the point. Nobody cared about next day delivery and now it’s kind of expected. Nobody is bothered by older stadiums until they go to a newer, modern one.
BTW, Neyland authorized a $350 million improvement plan. While I like the Vol sections, the visiting side is crap.
Here’s USF’s new stadium.Yeah that’s what I mean. The home side is fine. Has recently been renovated and they added premium chairback seats. The other side of Neyland? it looks like a dungeon. (See below)
View attachment 16251
Btw, there’s a pool under that side. I used to swim there …Yeah that’s what I mean. The home side is fine. Has recently been renovated and they added premium chairback seats. The other side of Neyland? it looks like a dungeon. (See below)
View attachment 16251
But how are the sight lines from the bathrooms? Can you watch the game while taking a whiz?Well where in college football is that usually seen? It’s not the nfl. I’ve been to Neyland Stadium, concourse has the same issues. And the bathrooms up there are WOEFUL compared to GT.
OMG it’s not SYMMETRICAL!
Speaking of the Ted...does anyone know how Georgia State has funded their facility modifications and upgrades? The Knight database lists their debt as zero. Have they snagged some state funding? Just wondering how they've managed it.Unfortunately would be a billion-dollar enterprise and compete directly with Truist and MBS, who are already host events of that size. It would have been a much better proposition around 2010 before Truist was built and started hosting concerts (the Ted rarely did) and MBS was but a dream (the Dome typically hosted concerts in the 60-70k range, MBS typically hosts concerts right in that 45k-60k range)
Speaking of the Ted...does anyone know how Georgia State has funded their facility modifications and upgrades? The Knight database lists their debt as zero. Have they snagged some state funding? Just wondering how they've managed it.
Edit to add: Georgia State's student fee income is triple ours.
Thanks for sharing this. So their AA was a) practically gifted a relatively modern stadium by the city ($30M doesn't come close to its value or construction costs), and b) somehow got the school and private equity to pay for renovations and surrounding new infrastructure. I thought the BoR prohibited GT and other state schools (the school) from paying more than a relatively small portion, I think 10%, of the athletic association's expenses. There was some creative financing involved here.New GSU Stadium Digital Renderings
Back To Sun BeltBy Southern Pigskin StaffSouthernPigskin.comFollow us at Twitter.com/SouthernPigskin. Become a fan at the SouthernPigskin.com Facebook PageGeorgia State has released new digital renderings of the renovated Turner Field.Georgia State University could spend $47.8 million to buy and...www.southernpigskin.com
According to this much of the money for the complex is from the university itself rather than the athletic department. I know our athletic department is in debt, but surely the Institute itself is well above water. I wonder to what extent an improvement of BDS (especially a mixed-use like discussed here) could be paid for by the Institute rather than GTAA.