Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Blogging Thoughts on 2013 and 2014 Camps and Conclusions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AE 87" data-source="post: 70248" data-attributes="member: 195"><p>I'm not sure your comment/standard applies to our offense. WRs in our offense are often used primarily for blocking. When we have a #1 WR, like BayBay and Smelter ended up being, the #2 WR doesn't get a lot of targets. This is especially true when we're game planning to get targets to ABacks like Orwin and Godhigh. All of that is to say that using # of catches may not be the best measure for determining status as proven for 2nd WRs. I don't know how many times he was targeted but 18 yds/catch would have placed him within the top 20 of receivers last year (admittedly 4 catches is way too few to be considered). I think you need to look at how he blocks, how he runs his routes, and how he adjusts to the ball in the air. In those categories, I think he's a proven WR for our offense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AE 87, post: 70248, member: 195"] I'm not sure your comment/standard applies to our offense. WRs in our offense are often used primarily for blocking. When we have a #1 WR, like BayBay and Smelter ended up being, the #2 WR doesn't get a lot of targets. This is especially true when we're game planning to get targets to ABacks like Orwin and Godhigh. All of that is to say that using # of catches may not be the best measure for determining status as proven for 2nd WRs. I don't know how many times he was targeted but 18 yds/catch would have placed him within the top 20 of receivers last year (admittedly 4 catches is way too few to be considered). I think you need to look at how he blocks, how he runs his routes, and how he adjusts to the ball in the air. In those categories, I think he's a proven WR for our offense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Blogging Thoughts on 2013 and 2014 Camps and Conclusions
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top