Dottie1145
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 2,212
I love what I’m hearing so far in this presser. Forward, always forward.
Has GT posted this to Facebook yet?I love what I’m hearing so far in this presser. Forward, always forward.
Good sign, but what does it really mean? More academic exceptions?When was the last time you saw the GT president sitting in front of a press conference next to the AD?
It means that the GT President has taken personal ownership for our athletic performance and is willing to tie his name to success there. That ain't nothing. And it's a far cry from what we've seen the past, oh, 30+ years if my memory serves.Good sign, but what does it really mean? More academic exceptions?
There are discussions on this board that lean in the direction of "if we had sports science and more academic exceptions we'd get Dexter Manley and Lawrence Taylor and we'd be competing for championships".Good sign, but what does it really mean? More academic exceptions?
Can you imagine former Presidents talking about NIL and the transfer portal? I can't.When was the last time you saw the GT president sitting in front of a press conference next to the AD?
It means that the GT President has taken personal ownership for our athletic performance and is willing to tie his name to success there. That ain't nothing. And it's a far cry from what we've seen the past, oh, 30+ years if my memory serves.
As to academic exceptions...who knows? And why does that have to be the answer? Give me an administration committed to getting us back on top in the major sports and I'll call it a good day. Until they prove themselves incapable, I don't think presuming the answer is necessary.
All fine and well and good, but I guess I'll just have to wait and see what specifically we will see going forward. I wasn't stating that we need more exceptions or anything, just throwing that out there because the answer to, "What can the GT president do" elicits only generalities. He recommended a good hire for AD, check. There aren't going to be any new majors or degree programs tied even remotely to football, nor should there be. The finances are separate. The only concrete thing I can think of is academic exceptions.There are discussions on this board that lean in the direction of "if we had sports science and more academic exceptions we'd get Dexter Manley and Lawrence Taylor and we'd be competing for championships".
It's not that simple, and Northwestern/Stanford/etc are not a few academic exceptions and new degree programs away from the playoffs. We aren't either.
What it does really mean is more important. Cabrera has shown this is something he cares about. We won't repeal state legislation or economics, and Cabrera has things to focus on, but somewhere along the line Batt will need help with something, and he's got someone with more power who will listen to him and support him. If Batt has reasonable needs that can be met and don't blow something else up, he'll probably get those things. He won't get everything, but he can get some important things.
Now, and over the next couple of years, Batt has to figure out what those important things are.
Battman?Kg feel comfortable with this guy going to ... batt for us going forward......
... ok, now it's been done. Lets all move on from here.
The last prez was a pass thru leader - next meeting.The last really constructive regime imo was Rice/Crecine, lots of good things happened, new facilities, new/broader academic programs, successful teams. Maybe this can be similar or even better. Amazing to see Cabrera interested.
Our presidents otherwise have been luke warm, mostly ignoring athletics, or in some cases practically hostile (Pettit). Research dollars will always get top priority, but nice to see athletics in the mix.