Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
ACC Coaches Talk Anonymously About Conference Foes for 2021
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Augusta_Jacket" data-source="post: 814278" data-attributes="member: 1191"><p>The recruiting comment seems to be misread. The quote was:</p><p></p><p>"They’re taking on transfers, but that makes more sense for them because of their lack of depth on the line. The issue for them is that <strong><em>they’re not making that big dent in recruiting we thought they would.</em></strong> Maybe it’s coming, but it hasn’t happened yet. They’re taking a lot of the best-of-the-rest guys that programs in our league or the SEC have passed on for one reason or another."</p><p></p><p>It seems that the coach had higher expectations than what CGC has so far shown. In his two full recruiting classes, GT finished ranked 25th (2020) and 49th (2021) per Rivals, and 27th and 48th per 247. From the 30,000 foot level, this doesn't appear to be that big of a dent considering the reputation CGC brought with him. The coach did note the transfers, but it's not on them to analyze every addition and re-rank the recruiting classes to justify their remarks. I can completely understand why they would say that.</p><p></p><p>The positive spin is opposing coaches expected CGC to recruit well at GT, and the initial class rankings aren't where they think CGC should be here. </p><p></p><p>Overall, these comments are a far cry from where they were last year.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Augusta_Jacket, post: 814278, member: 1191"] The recruiting comment seems to be misread. The quote was: "They’re taking on transfers, but that makes more sense for them because of their lack of depth on the line. The issue for them is that [B][I]they’re not making that big dent in recruiting we thought they would.[/I][/B] Maybe it’s coming, but it hasn’t happened yet. They’re taking a lot of the best-of-the-rest guys that programs in our league or the SEC have passed on for one reason or another." It seems that the coach had higher expectations than what CGC has so far shown. In his two full recruiting classes, GT finished ranked 25th (2020) and 49th (2021) per Rivals, and 27th and 48th per 247. From the 30,000 foot level, this doesn't appear to be that big of a dent considering the reputation CGC brought with him. The coach did note the transfers, but it's not on them to analyze every addition and re-rank the recruiting classes to justify their remarks. I can completely understand why they would say that. The positive spin is opposing coaches expected CGC to recruit well at GT, and the initial class rankings aren't where they think CGC should be here. Overall, these comments are a far cry from where they were last year. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
ACC Coaches Talk Anonymously About Conference Foes for 2021
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top