Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
A change in approach to coaching staffs/programs verbiage?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GTRX7" data-source="post: 796035" data-attributes="member: 1045"><p>I remain optimistic about CGC. I do think he could have done better in years 1 and 2 for sure. That said, I was very pleased with the growth from year 1 to 2. I think he is just a guy that we need to be a patient with -- not so much because of the transition from the option, but because he is still a young coach that is learning on the job (along with a relatively inexperienced coaching staff). </p><p></p><p>I am originally from Lexington, KY and therefore also follow Kentucky as well. I see CGC as similar to Mark Stoops. A guy that raised the profile and recruiting immediately, but took some time to "learn on the job" before he really elevated the team, cut out a lot of the early mistakes, and started winning more consistently. Stoops was on the hot seat after year 3 and almost fired, but now he is a guy mentioned with bigger jobs when they get open. It just took some time and patience. I see the same potential for CGC.</p><p></p><p>If we can see a similar level of improvement from year 3 over 2 that we saw from year 2 over 1, I will be very bullish looking forward!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GTRX7, post: 796035, member: 1045"] I remain optimistic about CGC. I do think he could have done better in years 1 and 2 for sure. That said, I was very pleased with the growth from year 1 to 2. I think he is just a guy that we need to be a patient with -- not so much because of the transition from the option, but because he is still a young coach that is learning on the job (along with a relatively inexperienced coaching staff). I am originally from Lexington, KY and therefore also follow Kentucky as well. I see CGC as similar to Mark Stoops. A guy that raised the profile and recruiting immediately, but took some time to "learn on the job" before he really elevated the team, cut out a lot of the early mistakes, and started winning more consistently. Stoops was on the hot seat after year 3 and almost fired, but now he is a guy mentioned with bigger jobs when they get open. It just took some time and patience. I see the same potential for CGC. If we can see a similar level of improvement from year 3 over 2 that we saw from year 2 over 1, I will be very bullish looking forward! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
A change in approach to coaching staffs/programs verbiage?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top