Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
A Blast from the Past
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Techster" data-source="post: 774598" data-attributes="member: 360"><p>Bro, you really want to play that game? One highlight from his freshmen year doesn't erase what's showing up on tape the past two seasons. Juanyeh is a good player, but the fact remains his speed on the back end is better suited for another position at this point in his college career. I hate when people like you isolate one play (at a position on special teams at that) and try to make a point, because the only way to prove you wrong to show you highlights of why I believe what I do...and I'm not going to do that because it denigrates him and is that what you're really after? Being a kick returner is not the same as the attributes needed at DB.</p><p></p><p>I'll just let you read what pro scouting service is saying about our two safeties:</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.pff.com/news/college-football-ranking-all-127-fbs-secondaries-through-cfb-week-14[/URL]</p><p></p><h3><em>103. <a href="https://www.pff.com/college/grades/position/qb" target="_blank">GEORGIA TECH</a></em></h3><p><em>Entering the year there were some big concerns with Georgia Tech’s coverage unit outside of the safety duo of Juanyeh Thomas and Tariq Carpenter, but those two have surprisingly been the biggest issues. Those two earned coverage grades of 80.8 and 77.4, respectively, last season. This year, the duo have lowered those marks to 58.8 and 47.4.</em></p><p></p><p>Not to be a d!ck, but you really need to know what you're talking about before you get on here and try to stir stuff up.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Techster, post: 774598, member: 360"] Bro, you really want to play that game? One highlight from his freshmen year doesn't erase what's showing up on tape the past two seasons. Juanyeh is a good player, but the fact remains his speed on the back end is better suited for another position at this point in his college career. I hate when people like you isolate one play (at a position on special teams at that) and try to make a point, because the only way to prove you wrong to show you highlights of why I believe what I do...and I'm not going to do that because it denigrates him and is that what you're really after? Being a kick returner is not the same as the attributes needed at DB. I'll just let you read what pro scouting service is saying about our two safeties: [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.pff.com/news/college-football-ranking-all-127-fbs-secondaries-through-cfb-week-14[/URL] [HEADING=2][I]103. [URL='https://www.pff.com/college/grades/position/qb']GEORGIA TECH[/URL][/I][/HEADING] [I]Entering the year there were some big concerns with Georgia Tech’s coverage unit outside of the safety duo of Juanyeh Thomas and Tariq Carpenter, but those two have surprisingly been the biggest issues. Those two earned coverage grades of 80.8 and 77.4, respectively, last season. This year, the duo have lowered those marks to 58.8 and 47.4.[/I] Not to be a d!ck, but you really need to know what you're talking about before you get on here and try to stir stuff up. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
A Blast from the Past
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top