Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
2023 Adidas SWAG Watch
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JacketOff" data-source="post: 933565" data-attributes="member: 4572"><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://sports.yahoo.com/ucla-nike-contract-pays-less-193400196.html[/URL]</p><p></p><p>Nike is paying less than half of what Under Armor was paying to UCLA. A massive brand name school soon to be in the B1G. Notoriety in football, men’s & women’s basketball, as well as baseball, softball, soccer, and plenty of other non-revenue sports. They’re getting $500k in cash from Nike per year. </p><p></p><p>You think we’d get that out of Nike? Our best teams on campus are baseball and golf, and Nike wanted nothing to do with them last go-around. GT is not going to get anything more out of Nike than we’re already getting out of Adidas. </p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.forbes.com/sites/danielkleinman/2018/09/11/the-most-valuable-college-apparel-deals-2018/amp/[/URL]</p><p></p><p>Clemson re-upped with Nike in 2018, the same year we signed with Adidas. They’re only getting $400k in cash from Nike through 2028. At the time of their contract extension, they had been to 3 consecutive CFP’s, had won a national championship, and were poised to win another one that same year. You really think if Nike values Clemson at $400k per year, they’re going to value us at the same rate? <em><strong>If </strong></em>they did, every Nike school who is attached to them at the same or lesser rates than what they give us will blow up in an outrage. We’re better off with Adidas right now than we are with anybody else.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JacketOff, post: 933565, member: 4572"] [URL unfurl="true"]https://sports.yahoo.com/ucla-nike-contract-pays-less-193400196.html[/URL] Nike is paying less than half of what Under Armor was paying to UCLA. A massive brand name school soon to be in the B1G. Notoriety in football, men’s & women’s basketball, as well as baseball, softball, soccer, and plenty of other non-revenue sports. They’re getting $500k in cash from Nike per year. You think we’d get that out of Nike? Our best teams on campus are baseball and golf, and Nike wanted nothing to do with them last go-around. GT is not going to get anything more out of Nike than we’re already getting out of Adidas. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.forbes.com/sites/danielkleinman/2018/09/11/the-most-valuable-college-apparel-deals-2018/amp/[/URL] Clemson re-upped with Nike in 2018, the same year we signed with Adidas. They’re only getting $400k in cash from Nike through 2028. At the time of their contract extension, they had been to 3 consecutive CFP’s, had won a national championship, and were poised to win another one that same year. You really think if Nike values Clemson at $400k per year, they’re going to value us at the same rate? [I][B]If [/B][/I]they did, every Nike school who is attached to them at the same or lesser rates than what they give us will blow up in an outrage. We’re better off with Adidas right now than we are with anybody else. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
2023 Adidas SWAG Watch
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top