Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
2021 Recruiting Class & Transfers In
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lv20gt" data-source="post: 774223" data-attributes="member: 2299"><p>Nobody is saying just consider it for us. You made a statement trying to portray our current recruiting efforts in a certain light and when it was brought up that didn't include a significant portion of our class and have sense been trying to justify only looking at part of the equation. It's not an accurate representation of the situation and if you're too lazy to consider a a part that constitutes nearly a third of our additions then you probably shouldn't be talking about it. </p><p></p><p>But here is how the ACC teams, at least those ahead of us look when players ranked similar to the incoming transfers are added to their class using the 247 class calculator. I didn't bother with those ranked below .85 because the difference was by less than a point overall and most of them were going to fall outside the top 20 recruits used in the calculations anyways. </p><p></p><p>GT - 215.15 </p><p>VT - 197.3</p><p>UL - 204.73</p><p>BC - 213.81</p><p>NCSU - 216.48</p><p>FSU - Not going to bother with the exact number. They were at 204 on 16 recruits and added 5 transfers who were .88 or higher. Needless to say they'd have ended significantly higher as just adding 4 .88s would net them well over our 215. </p><p>UVA - 205.72</p><p>Pitt - 218.02</p><p></p><p>UNC, Miami, and Clemson are so far ahead it really doesn't make sense to bother. Duke, Cuse, and Wake were already below us and added no more than 1 transfer that would have been factored in anyways so I didn't bother. None of the 3 added more than one transfer that would have been considered fwiw. </p><p></p><p>I'm not going to bother to do it nationally but hand waving away the transfers as "well nobody's transfers are being counted so it's fine" is to discount the fact that we did significantly better than the vast majority of schools in the transfer market. FSU is the only team in the ACC that did the as well. The top 4 teams are clearly Clemson, UNC, Miami, and FSU. After that though our class, with transfers included, is competitive with any in the conference and is right where we ended last year's class both in terms of the points and the placement.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lv20gt, post: 774223, member: 2299"] Nobody is saying just consider it for us. You made a statement trying to portray our current recruiting efforts in a certain light and when it was brought up that didn't include a significant portion of our class and have sense been trying to justify only looking at part of the equation. It's not an accurate representation of the situation and if you're too lazy to consider a a part that constitutes nearly a third of our additions then you probably shouldn't be talking about it. But here is how the ACC teams, at least those ahead of us look when players ranked similar to the incoming transfers are added to their class using the 247 class calculator. I didn't bother with those ranked below .85 because the difference was by less than a point overall and most of them were going to fall outside the top 20 recruits used in the calculations anyways. GT - 215.15 VT - 197.3 UL - 204.73 BC - 213.81 NCSU - 216.48 FSU - Not going to bother with the exact number. They were at 204 on 16 recruits and added 5 transfers who were .88 or higher. Needless to say they'd have ended significantly higher as just adding 4 .88s would net them well over our 215. UVA - 205.72 Pitt - 218.02 UNC, Miami, and Clemson are so far ahead it really doesn't make sense to bother. Duke, Cuse, and Wake were already below us and added no more than 1 transfer that would have been factored in anyways so I didn't bother. None of the 3 added more than one transfer that would have been considered fwiw. I'm not going to bother to do it nationally but hand waving away the transfers as "well nobody's transfers are being counted so it's fine" is to discount the fact that we did significantly better than the vast majority of schools in the transfer market. FSU is the only team in the ACC that did the as well. The top 4 teams are clearly Clemson, UNC, Miami, and FSU. After that though our class, with transfers included, is competitive with any in the conference and is right where we ended last year's class both in terms of the points and the placement. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
2021 Recruiting Class & Transfers In
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top