Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
“Competing” open Head Coaching jobs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GT33" data-source="post: 902980" data-attributes="member: 5550"><p>The Hill can stop being adversarial with athletics. Allow a portion of the billions they’re raising for academics, new campus infrastructure and research to be shared with athletics.</p><p></p><p>Here’s some non-“get us easy majors” elements:</p><p></p><p>1. You can dual purpose campus projects. Build a recreation center for example, but design into it specific portions to house volleyball or a minor sport like that so GTAA budget doesn’t need to be used or funding doesn’t need to be obtained to build a new standalone complex.</p><p></p><p>2. Start melding research with athletics. You could build an innovation center tailored to sports where athletes could go and try out new designs of gear, have performance measurements analyzed much like we did with Beesball but not on GTAA’s dime.</p><p></p><p>3. Work this NIL deal with major companies. Coke, Home Depot, etc have sponsorships to grow internships, etc but make the athletes a focal point of the process so those companies have access to the brainiacs they want or maybe some of the athletes are the brainiacs because that’s who we recruit.</p><p></p><p>There’s all kind of examples like this that are not the standard grades and give them alumni lists for fundraising that should be core to what GT does.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GT33, post: 902980, member: 5550"] The Hill can stop being adversarial with athletics. Allow a portion of the billions they’re raising for academics, new campus infrastructure and research to be shared with athletics. Here’s some non-“get us easy majors” elements: 1. You can dual purpose campus projects. Build a recreation center for example, but design into it specific portions to house volleyball or a minor sport like that so GTAA budget doesn’t need to be used or funding doesn’t need to be obtained to build a new standalone complex. 2. Start melding research with athletics. You could build an innovation center tailored to sports where athletes could go and try out new designs of gear, have performance measurements analyzed much like we did with Beesball but not on GTAA’s dime. 3. Work this NIL deal with major companies. Coke, Home Depot, etc have sponsorships to grow internships, etc but make the athletes a focal point of the process so those companies have access to the brainiacs they want or maybe some of the athletes are the brainiacs because that’s who we recruit. There’s all kind of examples like this that are not the standard grades and give them alumni lists for fundraising that should be core to what GT does. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
“Competing” open Head Coaching jobs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top