Search results

I mostly agree (and realize the point being made is about Bama), but how do you rationalize Oregon in the “best four” and leave out an undefeated team that beat them twice?

Couple of huge breaks for Texas…. Gees!

Don’t mind the call… gotta keep it in penix hands. That said, he needs to know he’s better off sliding or even taking a short loss sack there

I feel like Washington is the most complete team. Penix is great and their D is good enough. This game with Tx is gonna be a shootout but if the huskies can sneak by, I think they take Michigan Of course, if history is my teacher, my “feels” mean Washington is toast. :ROFLMAO:

Said to my son befor the play… can you imagine a bad snap here?! Not a catastrophic bad snap, but Milroe had to take eyes off the play to handle the low snap and never saw the lane.

I couldn’t hold out. I watched Tech and hadn’t watched another snap until the second half of Bama / Mich drew me in. Just wanted to say that the final Michigan time out was Cristobal-esque. WTF were they doing? Nice to see Bama out. Go Huskies! :D

Corn fed ladies certainly rock some curves. :ROFLMAO: I DIG those GIRLS!!!

No one is attending either school for beaches… but Indiana dunes is a real thing. Look it up.

Indiana dunes are surprisingly beautiful… just sayin. ;)

:(

In theory, yes. IF IF IF FSU’s complaint is correct that the original term of the deal ends in ‘27.

What I have heard (not confirmed) is this “option” (also not really confirmed- just in FSU complaint) is for ‘28-’36. The deadline to exercise is ‘25. Original term runs through ‘27 (according to FSU attorneys). In short, we should know in ‘25 if the acc deal ends in ‘27 or in ‘36.

The term “option” leads me to believe this is structured like a lease agreement. It has a fixed term for agreed rates and at the expiration of the primary term, the “lessee” (ESPN in this case) has the option to renew to lease for an additional term. If the ACC was knocking it out of the park...

I would LOVE it if we can land this guy… my assumption is that he is going to be very high profile prospect. Tough comp and likely big bags o’ NIL

A very fair point… and another thing; I’d be pretty surprised if something like this wasn’t VERY thoroughly vetted with ESPN in the context of adding programs. ACC would not do ANYTHING to jeopardize an option, so with only 24 months until such a major decision, why does it come out now and not...

Didn’t see that, but I’m sure there is about zero chance this begins and ends in a Florida courtroom.

Agree. But we also don’t know what the option terms are either. It’s possible that the option won’t be as lucrative for ESPN. That said, is it realistic to think the ACC negotiated that well? :LOL:

it appears they’ve checked that box. :LOL:

I agree with this… in my uninformed, non-legal opinion. :) The references to ESPN Agreement in the GOR (if confirmed… not sure we’ve seen the official current document) seem to indicate that it exists for the satisfaction of the ESPN deal, thru ‘27 or ‘36, at ESPN’s election. I don’t think the...

As I understand, the extension option to 2036 is not the biggest issue. The issue is that the ACC extended the deadline for ESPN to make the DECISION on the extension until ‘25. FSU (or any school) could potentially make a claim that the extended deadline causes them damage because they would...