Search results

https://triblive.com/sports/georgia-tech-dual-threat-quarterback-jeff-sims-provides-serious-test-to-pitt-secondary/ "“He can change a game with his feet as well as his arm,” Pitt strong safety Brandon Hill said. “Keeping him bottled up in the pocket and forcing him to make those throws, I feel...

I'm not sure which is worse, the Buzz's without wings or the one with Red wings. Both are just wrong.

That sounds about normal.

Or that athletic ability isn't the only factor needed to make someone a 4* on the field. I feel like CGC (regardless of any other faults fans want to whine about) is recruiting high-character players. I'm sure there will be exceptions, but I sense that there is a fair bit of player-to-player...

Good guys by 6 in a high-scoring game (37 - 31). I think the short-pass game is our Kryptonite and I don't think Pitt's D can stop our running game. I think our conditioning wears them down in the fourth and we grind out a six point win with a late fourth quarter TD on a Gibbs carry. That said...

I've been converted to the Church of Navy! Not only does it look sharp, I believe that it must help with our RPO's and ball-fakes. I know that it makes it harder for me to see where the ball is on TV, so I'll use that as my evidence that it works on the field! ;)

We need a super-hero artist to draw him!

Sweet! That's very helpful. Makes sense. Thanks!

That could work! A new category, not India Pale Ale but instead Welsh Pale Ale :) I like the site but I couldn't find a key to the metrics (like @Enuratique mentions above.) I guess that negative point plays are plays that are likely to provide points for the other team?

And I love these stats for QB runs: Player Stat Line Yards/Play EPA/Play EPA SR WPA Sam Howell 8 carries, 61 yds, 1 TD, 3 Fum (3 lost) 7.62 -1.26 -10.07 62% -27.0% Jeff Sims 10 carries, 128 yds, 3 TD, 0 Fum (0 lost) 12.80 1.34 13.41 70% 15.0% Bwahaha! I'm not even sure what WPA is...

Agree. Really interesting. The fact that most of the "Big Plays" were by UNC (with three of them negative Big Plays) is interesting.

Email sent to our CEO. They usually smile, pat me on the back and ignore me as the old dude with all the crazy (i.e., stupid) ideas!

Like many of us on this board, myself included, people look for any evidence that supports what they believe. Confirmation Bias is the most insidious type of bias, because more than almost anything we want to have been right all along. Our egos are fragile things. Media types are no different...

Seez you. :LOL:

College Football News on Pitt @ GT: Pitt vs Georgia Tech Prediction, Line Georgia Tech 38, Pitt 34 Line: Pitt -3.5, o/u: 59 ATS Confidence out of 5: 1

Ken has an article today: https://www.ajc.com/sports/georgia-tech/while-rehabbing-keion-white-staying-engaged-with-defense/WRF7OGK3B5EF7M3K4XBR5DBC2Q/ TL;DR - He's still recuperating.

I like the "repeated legal hard hits" that Thack talked about for the UNC game.

I don't disagree. It's why I said "of course" :) Everyone seems to do that...say "We are a really good team and just had a bad day. The others guys are good, but really if we played them again we'd beat them." I'm not so sure with UNC. I think they are horribly over-rated...as usual.

I thought that the complaint on Groh was the his defense was too hard to teach in the time allowed in the college environment or something like that? I know our players looked to be playing slower when he was DC.

Of course, UNC is saying it's not that GT is good, we just played poorly: https://chapelboro.com/sports/defensive-coordinator-jay-bateman-takes-blame-for-georgia-tech-loss-that-is-on-me