The Qua call is not CPJs MO. I think he was afraid we couldn't win with the regular stuff. I'll defer to his expertise but I think we could have shoved it down there throat.
I didn't like the call on the last TD. I didn't like the tackle eligible call and I didn't like the 4th down a back reverse type call. Having said that I love CPJ and the wing bone offense.
The defense played as well as I think they can play with the players we have. Roof has done an amazing...
Several calls I would not have made on offense but Searcy made a great play for the win. Defense played well when considering we didn't have a defensive player who would have started for UGA. Great win for us period.
The defense played pretty well today. Yes it was bend but don't break but offensively we could not put drives together. We scored on big plays. We couldn't stay on the field on offense. Having said that we found a way to score so I'll take it. Roof did what he had to do to win. I'll take it.
Running the Wishbone on offense is an equalizer. Defense is a personnel game against most offenses. We haven't been able to match up with our young players on D.
Offensively we've gotten production out if our a backs in the passing game and that has helped us immensely. We still have not hit on...
The offensive and defensive players are average except for the quarterback. He's the only playmaker we have. Scheme has nothing to do with it. It's the normal cycle of Tech football. In fact we've been a little better than average with Johnson and Roof. The cycle of players are on the upswing...
I agree. When you put players in position to make plays and they can't make them that's not scheme. Football eventually comes down to beating your man and making a play. We are getting better at it but we've rarely had those war daddy's who could consistently do that. If you "shoot gaps" as some...
Again, Tech has never had a D coordinator who has consistently over 4 or 5 years had a top defense regardless of scheme. Yea we've had Lindsay and Tenuta that have had a good defense for a year or two but not more than 3 over the last 50 years. The reason has nothing to do with schemes which I...
Check history sir. Ted provides a unique perspective that is valuable when recruiting at Tech. No other DC that we've ever had has been consistently good over more than a year or two.
As for his career he's been a DC in the SEC, Big Ten and ACC as well as a HC at Duke. You don't do those things...
I said that we have never had a DC or HC for that matter who has been a consistent winner since Dodd. That includes Curry and Lindsay who did well for a couple of years. No coach has consistent over a period of years. It's not the coach folks.
Both and other schemes require better players than we have at this time. We can shoot gaps and play 3 deep and we'll give up 50 a game. I'm not saying I wouldn't rather have that type of scheme but you better have the players to do it and we don't. If you zone blitz you have to have D linemen...
It's a glowing tribute to Paul Johnson and his staff that he's been here for 9 years which is a feat that no other coach has done since Dodd. If we don't want him making comparisons to Clemson then we don't need to hold him responsible to beat them.
As for excuses? If we want to compete we need...
Yes we've had two tough weeks but let's not throw in the towel just yet. I like how we match up with the rest of our schedule if we continue to improve. I still believe not having a deep threat is hurting us offensively but CPJ is a master of finding a way.
Defensively we are getting better...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.