I think there's a still a pretty big misunderstanding out there of what analytics actually are and it's become an easy scapegoat for people. There is no 'cookie cutter' of analytics. Analytics is just information. The magic is what you do (or don't do) with that information.
It adds up just fine if you actually read what op said. What they said was that they were done with Sims as a QB and that they weren't attacking Sims as a person. Pretty easy concept to concept to understand and honestly a pretty healthy way for fans to treat all athletes until they give you a...
Well yea. That's obvious when it comes to opinions on the conduct of head football coaches. Unfortunately for me that doesn't count for much and is probably the only thing I'd come out ahead on. :p
Lol I love this message board. You will write a sentence and someone else will come and say you said something else. Like no that is a whole nother sentence. Never gets old.
That makes two of us.
Yet again that makes two of us.
****head coaches everywhere thank you for your service. ✌️
I read the article. But when the the first quote you pull out is referencing the jury's finding of 'no clear and convincing evidence' of gross negligence without the acknowledgement that negligence was indeed found comes off as disingenuous to me.
I'm aware of what the difference between...
Jury also found them negligent and awarded the family $10 million. A cherry picked quote talking exclusively about the jury's findings for gross negligence doesn't magically make that disappear.
There's a lot of info about this out there that's not hard to find and it is a very bad look for...
If a UGA coach did what O'Leary did y'all would bring it up endlessly but because he had success here more then 20 years ago you make excuses for it.
Sports fandom is so funny sometimes.
Sigh. I don't know why you feel the need to turn every post that isn't 100% in step with you on this into some sort of passive aggressive semantics fight.
Interesting assumption but it's got nothing to do with what your buddies told you. Or however they might feel about GT. I'm comfortable...
I read a good write up somewhere that it has a lot to do with him being a great fit for the offensive system they were running last year and that what they're running now under Elliot doesn't suit his strengths.
A certain segment of our fan base thinks "schematic advantage" was a concept that didn't exist until CPJ came here in 2008 and therefore have a hard time separating the two despite it being a thing for over hundred years.
Knew we were in trouble when he talked up a brand manager he called 'Morpheus', which is cringe af, and then saw 'Morpheus' wasn't doing anything your basic design agency can't do.
I'm kidding. Sort of.
So much of this board is someone imagining a guy, tricking themselves into believing that guy exists, and then getting mad about it.
Poster child right here.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.