Search results

Who is a leader? Guy 1: Mitchell Guy 2: Mitchell Guy 3: Mitchell Guy 4: Mitchell Mitchell: Everybody else.

I'm learning stuff here. it seems like woody's scheme is conceptually more like a 335 than a 34. They may walk up the 3rd safety into a 34 look, but he goes into the DB room. That's interesting to me.

Like I said, not giving you a hard time :) I've heard the language before, and it was funny to read it on a message board. We're all good, dude.

Legit lol at "thanks for sharing your story". Not giving you a hard time, it was just such a therapeutic answer. "Don't negate their experience, acknowledge the validity of their emotions and then calmly and without judgement explain the facts" You're a doctor, and I'm not. I defer to your...

I must fully admit that the notion of addiction as a disease is one that I've never fundamentally grokked. I grew up with a drunk for a dad, and it has left me with very little sympathy for somebody who can't control themselves. I hear "it's a disease", but it's also a choice, every time you...

Exactly. They did let him come back. Twice.

Looks like the tiger-stripes are going to be a part of the theme this year.

Never. A man has needs.

Ugh, just tried it out. Crashes every time, and my phone had already updated to the new ones of the old one is lost. Come on Georgia Tech you're an institution of Technology make your app work

I still kinda do. You fail 2x, and you KNOW the policy, its just plain stupid to keep using. I don't care if the law is stupid, it's your future you're throwing away to get stoned.

which sucks, because the last one was really good. got live GT audio in my car here in DC no matter what when i was driving my kid to soccer games and whatnot. The old app worked really well

Couple "or"s in there

I prefer Best Loyal University Enthusiast ;)

Saw this on another thread I've heard Stan talk over and over and over about brand, and ideation, and all that, but I've never heard the brand actually spelled out. It looks like the brand is the top of the board: "We develop the young people who will change the world". THAT is a brand...

I feel like this isn't getting enough attention. But not even just alumni. Rando's as well. But the fact that it's on the board shows they're thinking. Edit. Gonna give this its own thread

Again, I think this is largely fair. At best, your can say that CPJ is not an impact recruiter. You can make the argument that schools largely recruit the level of player that they recruit, independent of who is coaching. the argument is roughly that unless a coach is a spectacular recruiter...

to wit, here are his offensive rankings the last decade: 2017 23 2016 21 2015 88 2014 3 2013 39 2012 11 2011 16 2010 64 2009 2 2008 24 Those are great numbers, IMO (especially when you throw out the single outlier in 2015. He consistently produces a top 25...

I won't say you're wrong. I disagree, and I think my argument has merit, but I'd be willing to listen to yours, as well.

I'm a PJ fan, and this is the case. Being a head coach is different than being an offensive coordinator. I think CPJ has proven himself to be a great offensive coordinator at this level, but only an above average head coach. We shall see if that changes with Woody.

....I'm going to be honest, this is pretty damning: “I know I catch myself sometimes – if the first option isn’t there, I kind of peek at the second option, but don’t really think to throw it to him, and I go ahead and get outside the pocket because, of course, I’m really good with my legs,”...