Plays you analyzed:
Plays Andrew analyzed:
But you analyzed all four plays...might be some similar play types that you covered, but different plays all together.
People being falsely accused also get "EXTREMELY" defensive. And I couldn't care less that Sed is a former player. He could be my brother, but if he's going to call out one of my writers for plagiarism (falsely, I might add), yeah, I'm going to come to his defense.
Sorry for exaggerating? Forgot it's the Internet and people take everything literally.
I'm not going to apologize for coming to the defense of my writers. I know Andrew worked his *** off to put his article out, and to have some random former player call him out for "plagiarizing" when the only...
Andrew puts a lot of leg work into what he does. Feel free to contact him directly for his detailed notes. When we brought him on, for his writing preview, he sent me the most detailed game notes I had ever seen. But you know, you definitely did all the work here
So reviewing the same information and coming to the same conclusion about the information is plagiarism? Okay...
Reviewing the same plays isn't a crime. Also don't mind the fact that he offers different and fuller analysis of the same plays