Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Star Rankings - Not Fatally Flawed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GTNavyNuke" data-source="post: 134950" data-attributes="member: 322"><p>Not a lot here for those that say star rankings are useless. But Bill Connelly takes a good look at the limited, but valuable, input from recruiting rankings.</p><p><a href="http://www.footballstudyhall.com/2015/2/10/8012747/college-football-recruiting-rankings-strengths-flaws" target="_blank">http://www.footballstudyhall.com/2015/2/10/8012747/college-football-recruiting-rankings-strengths-flaws</a> </p><p></p><p>"<em>There are, after all, three pieces to basically any team sport: talent acquisition, talent development, and talent deployment. The middle is the toughest to talk about because, among other things, it involves things we can't see."</em></p><p></p><p>"<em>If I know Alabama (or Ohio State, or, yes, Wisconsin, Oregon, Missouri, etc.) has a great system for evaluating players, and I know that one or more of these systems determined Player A worthy of a scholarship offer, that is probably a data point worthy of consideration</em>."</p><p></p><p>"<em><a href="http://www.sbnation.com/college-football-recruiting/2014/2/18/5312840/college-football-recruiting-teams-championships" target="_blank">Bud has done a strong job through the years of pointing out the teams who have "championship-grade recruiting"</a>, and as he has pointed out a few times, the list of "overachievers" in the 538 piece linked above -- Wisconsin, Oregon, Missouri, Oregon State, <strong>Georgia Tech, </strong>West Virginia, Stanford, Virginia Tech, Northwestern, TCU -- includes nobody who has won a national title in the span of the study (2005-14). I</em><strong><em>n fact, since World War II, the teams on this list can claim two national titles, period: Georgia Tech in 1952 and 1990.</em>"</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p>Yeah we've done more with less than most teams. But to realistically contend for and win a NC, we need the elite (4 and 5 stars) especially on D to increase the odds.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GTNavyNuke, post: 134950, member: 322"] Not a lot here for those that say star rankings are useless. But Bill Connelly takes a good look at the limited, but valuable, input from recruiting rankings. [URL]http://www.footballstudyhall.com/2015/2/10/8012747/college-football-recruiting-rankings-strengths-flaws[/URL] "[I]There are, after all, three pieces to basically any team sport: talent acquisition, talent development, and talent deployment. The middle is the toughest to talk about because, among other things, it involves things we can't see."[/I] "[I]If I know Alabama (or Ohio State, or, yes, Wisconsin, Oregon, Missouri, etc.) has a great system for evaluating players, and I know that one or more of these systems determined Player A worthy of a scholarship offer, that is probably a data point worthy of consideration[/I]." "[I][URL='http://www.sbnation.com/college-football-recruiting/2014/2/18/5312840/college-football-recruiting-teams-championships']Bud has done a strong job through the years of pointing out the teams who have "championship-grade recruiting"[/URL], and as he has pointed out a few times, the list of "overachievers" in the 538 piece linked above -- Wisconsin, Oregon, Missouri, Oregon State, [B]Georgia Tech, [/B]West Virginia, Stanford, Virginia Tech, Northwestern, TCU -- includes nobody who has won a national title in the span of the study (2005-14). I[/I][B][I]n fact, since World War II, the teams on this list can claim two national titles, period: Georgia Tech in 1952 and 1990.[/I]" [/B] Yeah we've done more with less than most teams. But to realistically contend for and win a NC, we need the elite (4 and 5 stars) especially on D to increase the odds. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Star Rankings - Not Fatally Flawed
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top