Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
If Tech Was Consistently Ranked in Top 25 for Recruiting….
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Boomergump" data-source="post: 28533" data-attributes="member: 639"><p>I find it curious how when we talk about the value of better recruiting rankings, the conversation always starts to revolve around the offense. I think we need more talent, don't get me wrong, but I am not convinced that the national recruiting service rankings are the metric we should concern ourselves with, ESPECIALLY, when we are talking about offense. IF, IF, IF the rankings had any merit at all, IMHO they would have a lot more relevance to us on the defensive side of the ball. The guys who best suit our offense are likely not going to be ranked in the upper echelon of their position groups anyway, especially the closer you get to the ball. Consider the ideal QB or OT for our offense. Are they likely to be ranked highly? IDTS. We would love to get a highly rated WR I would think, so long as he was not a prima donna and was a good blocker. What is the ideal AB? Those guys could be highly ranked, but not really as important as, say BB.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Boomergump, post: 28533, member: 639"] I find it curious how when we talk about the value of better recruiting rankings, the conversation always starts to revolve around the offense. I think we need more talent, don't get me wrong, but I am not convinced that the national recruiting service rankings are the metric we should concern ourselves with, ESPECIALLY, when we are talking about offense. IF, IF, IF the rankings had any merit at all, IMHO they would have a lot more relevance to us on the defensive side of the ball. The guys who best suit our offense are likely not going to be ranked in the upper echelon of their position groups anyway, especially the closer you get to the ball. Consider the ideal QB or OT for our offense. Are they likely to be ranked highly? IDTS. We would love to get a highly rated WR I would think, so long as he was not a prima donna and was a good blocker. What is the ideal AB? Those guys could be highly ranked, but not really as important as, say BB. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
If Tech Was Consistently Ranked in Top 25 for Recruiting….
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top