Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="roadkill" data-source="post: 1009735" data-attributes="member: 1555"><p>I agree with [USER=2426]@RonJohn[/USER] that as long as ESPN continues to have a media deal with the ACC, the GOR seems rock solid until 2036. It’s also been stated by multiple lawyers that the GOR appears to be ironclad. I noted that the GOR states that it is a requirement for the ESPN deal, but not vice versa as has been inferred.</p><p></p><p>As far as Clemson’s argument is concerned, there is an awkwardly worded sentence in the GOR that appears to exclude certain “sports” from the GOR where “such Member institution will not participate as a member of the conference.” I interpret this as a concession to schools for their OOC games for non-revenue sports. However, this sentence includes a statement that these sports would need to be agreed upon by the Member <em>and the Conference</em>, and I can’t see the ACC voluntarily agreeing to give up the rights before the end date of the GOR.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="roadkill, post: 1009735, member: 1555"] I agree with [USER=2426]@RonJohn[/USER] that as long as ESPN continues to have a media deal with the ACC, the GOR seems rock solid until 2036. It’s also been stated by multiple lawyers that the GOR appears to be ironclad. I noted that the GOR states that it is a requirement for the ESPN deal, but not vice versa as has been inferred. As far as Clemson’s argument is concerned, there is an awkwardly worded sentence in the GOR that appears to exclude certain “sports” from the GOR where “such Member institution will not participate as a member of the conference.” I interpret this as a concession to schools for their OOC games for non-revenue sports. However, this sentence includes a statement that these sports would need to be agreed upon by the Member [I]and the Conference[/I], and I can’t see the ACC voluntarily agreeing to give up the rights before the end date of the GOR. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top