Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Techster" data-source="post: 1003222" data-attributes="member: 360"><p>FSU's use of some language is obviously for effect. The unilateral option is a very specific clause in a very specific document. FSU's pointing to that very specific clause, in a very specific document constitutes their proclaiming it will be an exhibit in the lawsuit. It's also one of their central arguments that the ACC undermined their fiduciary duties. </p><p></p><p>I get that you don't think much of the merits of FSU's lawsuit (I also think they're grasping at straws...unless ESPN does steps out of the ACC agreement), and their puffery, but I highly doubt they would specifically point to a VERY specific unilateral clause if they didn't intend to use it. Also, there other ACC teams that are not happy with their station amongst their "peers" in the P2 and want out of the ACC. The fact that no one has refuted the FSU unilateral option claim is quite telling.</p><p></p><p>If you choose to question it, you should. This lawsuit will be very public, and the documents will be laid bare for all to see. We won't have long to wait to see what the truth is...either through the courts, or through ESPN exercising their right (reportedly) of opting out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Techster, post: 1003222, member: 360"] FSU's use of some language is obviously for effect. The unilateral option is a very specific clause in a very specific document. FSU's pointing to that very specific clause, in a very specific document constitutes their proclaiming it will be an exhibit in the lawsuit. It's also one of their central arguments that the ACC undermined their fiduciary duties. I get that you don't think much of the merits of FSU's lawsuit (I also think they're grasping at straws...unless ESPN does steps out of the ACC agreement), and their puffery, but I highly doubt they would specifically point to a VERY specific unilateral clause if they didn't intend to use it. Also, there other ACC teams that are not happy with their station amongst their "peers" in the P2 and want out of the ACC. The fact that no one has refuted the FSU unilateral option claim is quite telling. If you choose to question it, you should. This lawsuit will be very public, and the documents will be laid bare for all to see. We won't have long to wait to see what the truth is...either through the courts, or through ESPN exercising their right (reportedly) of opting out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top