Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
CFP Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Northeast Stinger" data-source="post: 982475" data-attributes="member: 1640"><p>You are always one of the “mature voices in the room.” So, what do you think would be a proper procedure / outcome for any potential review of CFP Committee’s process?</p><p></p><p>I ask this because I am always slightly tempted to act in a childish way when I see others continually getting preferential treatment by acting childishly. In my opinion the SEC has acted childishly for a long time and the reward is that their behavior always seems to get them some deference in ways that ultimately benefit them. The ACC, it feels like by comparison, tries to act with more dignity and ends up being a punching bag as a result.</p><p></p><p>I mentioned in a recent post how Vince Dooley acted in the wake of the Jasper Sanks fumble, demanding an SEC investigation, threatening a criminal lawsuit against the refs involved, and, generally, keeping the “controversy” in the public eye for weeks after the game was history. I am aware that what I am going to say now is perhaps my biased fan perception but it sure feels like the Sanks fumble was the last time a questionable call went against uga in this rivalry game and I bet the crowd on here good easily name several questionable calls that have gone against Tech in the interim. Maybe we are paranoid but many Tech fans now fear the refs in that game almost as much as the refs. It is hard not to believe someone started working the refs a long time ago with at least an unconscious impact on the game.</p><p></p><p>Now that I’ve shown my childish side, I’ll return to the main questions. Do you think the Scott letter is warranted? A good idea? What process going forward would be helpful? And, for me, will it ever be possible to root out the SEC bias in the selection committee given how effective the SEC’s childish behavior in the past has been?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Northeast Stinger, post: 982475, member: 1640"] You are always one of the “mature voices in the room.” So, what do you think would be a proper procedure / outcome for any potential review of CFP Committee’s process? I ask this because I am always slightly tempted to act in a childish way when I see others continually getting preferential treatment by acting childishly. In my opinion the SEC has acted childishly for a long time and the reward is that their behavior always seems to get them some deference in ways that ultimately benefit them. The ACC, it feels like by comparison, tries to act with more dignity and ends up being a punching bag as a result. I mentioned in a recent post how Vince Dooley acted in the wake of the Jasper Sanks fumble, demanding an SEC investigation, threatening a criminal lawsuit against the refs involved, and, generally, keeping the “controversy” in the public eye for weeks after the game was history. I am aware that what I am going to say now is perhaps my biased fan perception but it sure feels like the Sanks fumble was the last time a questionable call went against uga in this rivalry game and I bet the crowd on here good easily name several questionable calls that have gone against Tech in the interim. Maybe we are paranoid but many Tech fans now fear the refs in that game almost as much as the refs. It is hard not to believe someone started working the refs a long time ago with at least an unconscious impact on the game. Now that I’ve shown my childish side, I’ll return to the main questions. Do you think the Scott letter is warranted? A good idea? What process going forward would be helpful? And, for me, will it ever be possible to root out the SEC bias in the selection committee given how effective the SEC’s childish behavior in the past has been? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
CFP Discussion
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top