Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
Bama Basketball murder case
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lv20gt" data-source="post: 936203" data-attributes="member: 2299"><p>From what I can tell....</p><p></p><p>Michael Davis did the actual shooting. Darius Miles was the owner of the gun. Miller had dropped Miles off at the club but then had left. Afterwards Miles texted Miller "I need my joint" to which Miller went back to the scene. It then seems that Miles told Davis where his gun was in the car, Davis went and got it, and then Davis went and shot at the girl and her boyfriend. </p><p></p><p>My guess, and likewise I am no attorney, is that because Miller was delivering the gun to Miles and that it was Davis that did the shooting, it would be argued that it wasn't reasonable for Miller to foresee Miller would give the fun to Davis to shoot someone, especially since Miller wasn't present for the prior actions. In contrast it is reasonable to expect Miller to know that Harris would do something when he told Davis where the gun was because he had knowledge of what had happened before between the victim and the shooter. </p><p></p><p>I think the reality is likely the sports program aspect doesn't play much of a part and because Miles admitted to providing the gun, it would be hard to bring charges against Miller from that aspect unless they had strong proof that he knew Miles planned to give Davis the gun or use it himself which doesn't seem to be the case. Otherwise there is probably smaller charges that could maybe be tacked on, but if he's already cooperating they likely see no need to do so. As far as the bold goes, I wouldn't agree with that. In his situation, I think it's very believable that he is cooperating because he feels it's the right thing to do, and likely feels somewhat guilty about the role he played, even if he wasn't aware of what was going on. I think the using charges to leverage cooperation would likely more often be used for people more directly involved. </p><p></p><p>Also, it needs to be said that in cases such as this the talk of legality is not the same with what is right or wrong. Miller certainly messed up, but I'm not sure if it rises to the level of legal issue or not.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lv20gt, post: 936203, member: 2299"] From what I can tell.... Michael Davis did the actual shooting. Darius Miles was the owner of the gun. Miller had dropped Miles off at the club but then had left. Afterwards Miles texted Miller "I need my joint" to which Miller went back to the scene. It then seems that Miles told Davis where his gun was in the car, Davis went and got it, and then Davis went and shot at the girl and her boyfriend. My guess, and likewise I am no attorney, is that because Miller was delivering the gun to Miles and that it was Davis that did the shooting, it would be argued that it wasn't reasonable for Miller to foresee Miller would give the fun to Davis to shoot someone, especially since Miller wasn't present for the prior actions. In contrast it is reasonable to expect Miller to know that Harris would do something when he told Davis where the gun was because he had knowledge of what had happened before between the victim and the shooter. I think the reality is likely the sports program aspect doesn't play much of a part and because Miles admitted to providing the gun, it would be hard to bring charges against Miller from that aspect unless they had strong proof that he knew Miles planned to give Davis the gun or use it himself which doesn't seem to be the case. Otherwise there is probably smaller charges that could maybe be tacked on, but if he's already cooperating they likely see no need to do so. As far as the bold goes, I wouldn't agree with that. In his situation, I think it's very believable that he is cooperating because he feels it's the right thing to do, and likely feels somewhat guilty about the role he played, even if he wasn't aware of what was going on. I think the using charges to leverage cooperation would likely more often be used for people more directly involved. Also, it needs to be said that in cases such as this the talk of legality is not the same with what is right or wrong. Miller certainly messed up, but I'm not sure if it rises to the level of legal issue or not. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
Bama Basketball murder case
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top