Day off on Saturday probably helped neutralize the momentum we gained after the second game. Sad our pitching took us out of today early, but three runs isn’t winning many games on offense either.
Big upcoming week.
I just came here to post this same link!
Considering the problems the MLB had with sticky substances last year, I am 100% convinced the player was adding something to the ball. I do also agree that there is a good chance a good number of teams/players take part in this.
Paused my audiobook during a road trip to listen to the game. Wish I hadn’t. I don’t mind being beaten in one phase of a game, but getting beaten in both sucks.
The same can be said for showing a batter’s plate appearance. You “could” just add the at bats to the walks, sacrifices etc. But why force someone to calculate things when you can just give it to them.
One of the rare ones where pitching does enough to win, and the bats don’t show up.
Pretty crazy to see BC throw a pitcher 8 innings and our best inning comes early. I forget who said it in chat, but opposing team’s all seem to have a Cy Young waiting to pitch against us.
Let's win tomorrow and force a rubber match. Disappointing our batting with risp, but they put themselves in a position to win, which is at least a positive.
I voted one last week and was delightfully wrong. Going to continue that trend.
On the defensive side, we just have to find a way to limit the big innings.
I read the summary, but I just don't understand. Is the claim that the contract they willingly signed nonenforceable from the start? The whole point of the GOR was to prevent what Clemson is now trying to do, and they knowingly inked their signatures.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.